一种特别有希望的可能性是,团体之间的接触可能会鼓励更强大的多数团体成员作为盟友来工作,即努力消除压迫和系统性的不公正。 例如,多维迪奥(Dovidio)和他的同事建议:“联系还为多数群体成员提供了潜在的强大机会,以促进与少数群体的政治团结。”同样,特洛普(Tropp)—关于联系和联系的荟萃分析的合著者之一 偏见—告诉《纽约杂志》的“切入点”,“也有可能改变具有历史优势的群体的未来行为,使弱势群体受益的接触。”尽管群体之间的接触并不是万灵药,但它是减少冲突和偏见的有力工具。 甚至可能鼓励实力更强的团体的成员成为鼓吹倡导边缘化团体成员权利的盟友。

新西兰梅西大学Media 论文代写:纽约杂志

A particularly promising possibility is that contact between groups may encourage stronger members of the majority to work as allies, that is, to work to eliminate oppression and systemic injustice. For example, Dovidio and his colleagues suggest that “contacts also provide potentially powerful opportunities for members of the majority to promote political solidarity with minorities.” Similarly, Tropp—about contact and contact One of the co-authors of the meta-analysis is to tell the New York Journal of the “cut-in point” that “it is also possible to change the future behavior of groups with historical advantages and benefit the vulnerable groups.” Although the contact between groups is not Panacea, but it is a powerful tool for reducing conflict and prejudice. It may even encourage members of stronger groups to become advocates who advocate the rights of members of marginalized groups.

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注