尽管谢里夫的“强盗洞穴”实验被认为是社会心理学的一个里程碑式的研究,但一些研究人员批评了谢里夫的方法。 例如,包括作家吉娜·佩里(Gina Perry)在内的一些人建议,没有充分注意研究人员(冒充营地人员)在制造团体敌对行动中的作用。 由于研究人员通常不干预冲突,因此露营者可能已经认为与其他团体的战斗是宽容的。 佩里还指出,强盗洞穴研究也存在潜在的伦理问题:孩子们不知道他们正在接受研究,事实上,许多人直到佩里与他们联系数十年才意识到自己曾经在接受研究。 稍后向他们询问他们的经历。 强盗洞穴研究的另一个潜在警告是,谢里夫(Sherif)较早的一项研究得出了截然不同的结果。

加拿大哈利法克斯Assignment代写:研究人员

Although Sharif’s “robber’s cave” experiment is considered a landmark study in social psychology, some researchers have criticized Sharif’s method. For example, some, including writer Gina Perry, suggested not paying enough attention to the role of researchers (impersonating camp personnel) in hostilities in manufacturing groups. Because researchers usually don’t intervene in conflict, campers may already consider fighting against other groups to be tolerant. Perry also pointed out that there is a potential ethical problem with robber cave research: children don’t know they are receiving research, and in fact, many people didn’t realize they were receiving research until decades after they contacted them. Ask them later about their experiences. Another potential caveat to robber cave research is that an earlier study by Sherif yielded very different results.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *